Preview

MD-Onco

Advanced search

Effects of sonodynamic component of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on treatment outcomes of cervical cancer patients

https://doi.org/10.17650/2782-3202-2025-5-3-29-37

Abstract

Aim. The present study aims to investigate the efficacy of a modified combination neoadjuvant polychemotherapy (NACT) with a sonodynamic component in patients diagnosed with stage IIA2 locally advanced cervical cancer.
Materials and methods. The study encompassed data from 82 patients diagnosed with locally advanced cervical cancer, classified as stage IIA2 (T2a2N0M0). All patients underwent NACT courses according to the cisplatin and bleomycetin regimen. Patients in the control group (n = 32) underwent intravenous NACT, while patients in the main group (n = 50) underwent intravenous NACT in conjunction with contact sonodynamic chemotherapy comprising 5-fluorouracil. The number of NACT courses ranged from two to three, contingent upon the immediate treatment outcomes. Following the attainment of complete or partial regression of the tumor, an extended nerve-sparing extirpation of the uterus, including the appendages, was performed. In instances where the initial treatment did not yield the desired outcome, that is, stabilization of the process, the subsequent treatment plan involved the administration of chemoradiation therapy.
Results. The study revealed that patients in the experimental group demonstrated a substantially higher degree of resectability following two cycles of NACT with a sonodynamic component when compared to the control group. The observed values were 94 and 56.2 %, respectively (p <0.05). A greater proportion of patients in the control group required the third course of NACT, with 43.75 % of patients requiring this intervention, compared to 6 % of patients in the main group (p <0.05). The prevalence of drug-induced pathomorphosis grades III–IV in the main group was documented in 64.3 % of cases, while in the control group drug-induced pathomorphosis grades I–II were predominant (60 %). The overall 5-year survival rate of patients in the primary cohort was notably higher than that of the control group. The study revealed that 82.1 % of the subjects in the first group exhibited a positive response, in contrast to 63.6 % of the subjects in the second group (p <0.05). The five-year relapse-free survival rate in the primary cohort was 78.8 ± 9.5 %, while in the control group, it was 58.8 ± 6.2 % (p <0.05). Conclusion. The application of accelerated regression of cancer tumors under the influence of combined NACT has been demonstrated to result in a reduction in the number of NACT courses and an increase in the number of optimal radical surgeries. The efficacy of the method was substantiated by the findings of morphological and immunohistochemical studies, as evidenced by the indicators of 5-year overall and relapsefree survival for this patient population.

About the Authors

T. I. Moiseenko
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

63, 14th Line St., Rostov-on-Don 344037



A. P. Menshenina
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

63, 14th Line St., Rostov-on-Don 344037



E. M. Frantsiyants
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

63, 14th Line St., Rostov-on-Don 344037



N. A. Nazaralieva
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

63, 14th Line St., Rostov-on-Don 344037



E. M. Nepomnyashchaya
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

63, 14th Line St., Rostov-on-Don 344037



E. P. Ulyanova
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

63, 14th Line St., Rostov-on-Don 344037



A. A. Ovsyannikova
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

63, 14th Line St., Rostov-on-Don 344037



References

1. Pak R.V. Epidemiological features of cervical cancer in the world. Vestnik = Vestnik Kazahskogo natsionalnogo meditsinskogo universiteta = Vestnik KazNMU 2019;(1):678–80. (In Russ.).

2. Kulieva G.Z., Mkrtchyan L.S., Krikunova L.I. et al. Epidemiological aspects of the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer (literature review). Opukholi zhenskoy reproduktivnoy systemy = Tumors of female reproductive system 2023;19(3):77–84. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1994-4098-2023-19-3-77-84

3. Protasova A.E., Lyashchenko V.A. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with advanced forms of invasive cervical cancer and morphological features of their tumors. Opukholi zhenskoy reproduktivnoy systemy = Tumors of female reproductive system 2021;17(2):93–9. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1994-4098-2021-17-2-93-99

4. Mkrtchyan L., Kaprin A., Ivanov S. et al. The effectiveness of treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer depending on the factors of prognosis. Voprosy onkologii = Problems in Oncology 2019;65(4):584–9. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.37469/0507-3758-2019-65-4-584-589

5. Dubinina A.V. Novel techniques of chemoradiation therapy in the treatment of locally-advanced cervical cancer. Onkoginekologiya = Gynecologic Oncology 2021(1):75–87. (In Russ.).

6. Koh W.J., Abu-Rustum N.R., Bean S. et al. Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019;17(1):64–84. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0001

7. Ashrafyan L.A., Kiselev V.I., Kuznetsov I.N. et al. Cervical cancer: issues with prevention and screening in the Russian Federation. Doctor.Ru = Doctor.Ru 2019;11(166):50–4. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31550/1727-2378-2019-166-11-50-54

8. Ovodenko D.L. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery for cervical cancer stages IB2–IIIB. Dis. … doct. med. sci. Moscow, 2020. 233 p. (In Russ.).

9. Coleman R.L., Lorusso D., Gennigens C. et al.; innovaTV 204/ GOG-3023/ENGOT-cx6 Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of tisotumab vedotin in previously treated recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (innovaTV 204/GOG-3023/ENGOT-cx6): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2021;22(5):609–19. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00056-5

10. De Foucher T., Bendifallah S., Ouldamer L. et al.; Groupe de Recherche Francogyn, France. Patterns of recurrence and prognosis in locally advanced FIGO stage IB2 to IIB cervical cancer: retrospective multicentre study from the FRANCOGYN group. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019;45(4):659–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.11.014

11. Ashrafyan L.A., Aleshikova O.I., Babaeva N.A. et al. Complex ultrasound diagnostic assessment of the results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer (Stages IIB–IIIB). Opukholi zhenskoy reproduktivnoy systemy = Tumors of female reproductive system 2015;11(2):76–81. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1994-4098-2015-11-2-76-81

12. Ulrikh E.A., Borshchevskiy V.G., Zakharov I.S. et al. Chemotherapy for cervical cancer and contraception: discussion issues and clinical case. Opukholi zhenskoy reproduktivnoy systemy = Tumors of female reproductive system. 2024;20(1):147–52. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1994-4098-2024-20-1-147-152

13. Ou Z., Zhao D., Li B. et al. A preoperative nomogram for predicting chemoresistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical squamous carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer Res Treat 2021;53(1):233–42. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2020.159

14. Ostanko V.S. Optimization of diagnostics and treatment of cervical cancer. Dis. … doct. med. sci. Rostov-on-Don, 2003. 392 p. (In Russ.).

15. Shpileva O.V., Kolomiets L.A., Startseva Zh.A., Churuksaeva O.N. Local hyperthermia in the treatmnet of locally advanced cervical cancer: current view on the problem. Sibirskiy onkologicheskiy zhurnal = Siberian Journal of Oncology 2021;20(4):122–9. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21294/1814-4861-2021-20-4-122-129

16. Tzerkovsky D.A., Protopovich E.L., Stupak D.S. Sonodynamic and sono-photodynamic therapy in oncology. Biomedical Photonics 2019;8(2):31–46. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24931/2413-9432-2019-8-2-31-46

17. Mo S., Coussios C.C., Seymour L., Carlisle R. Ultrasound- enhanced drug delivery for cancer. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2012;9(12):1525–38. DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2012.739603

18. Yamaguchi T., Kitahara S., Kusuda K. et al. Current landscape of sonodynamic therapy for treating cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13(24):6184. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246184

19. Krokhmal Yu.N. Modified chemoradiation treatment for patients with locally advanced cancer of the oral mucosa. Abstract of dis. … cand. med. sci. Rostov-on-Don, 2014. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Moiseenko T.I., Menshenina A.P., Frantsiyants E.M., Nazaralieva N.A., Nepomnyashchaya E.M., Ulyanova E.P., Ovsyannikova A.A. Effects of sonodynamic component of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on treatment outcomes of cervical cancer patients. MD-Onco. 2025;5(3):29-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2782-3202-2025-5-3-29-37

Views: 24


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-3202 (Print)
ISSN 2782-6171 (Online)