Preview

MD-Onco

Advanced search

Clinical example of intracorporeal antiperistaltic ileotransverse anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

https://doi.org/10.17650/2782-3202-2025-5-1-16-24

Abstract

In the era of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer, more and more studies are devoted to improving surgical techniques of intracorporeal ileo-colic anastomosis. In this article, we demonstrate our own experience in performing a hardware, intracorporeal, antiperistaltic ileo-transverse anastomosis in three patients after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer. This type of anastomosis can become a good alternative to an intracorporeal isoperistaltic anastomosis, reducing the time and cost of the surgical procedure.

About the Authors

A. O. Rasulov
Clinical Hospital “Lapino” of the “Mother and Child” Group of companies
Russian Federation

111 1st Uspenskoe Shosse, Lapino, Moscow region 143081 



J. M. Madyarov
Clinical Hospital “Lapino” of the “Mother and Child” Group of companies
Russian Federation

Jasur Mahirovich Madyarov 

111 1st Uspenskoe Shosse, Lapino, Moscow region 143081 



A. E. Kulikov
Clinical Hospital “Lapino” of the “Mother and Child” Group of companies
Russian Federation

111 1st Uspenskoe Shosse, Lapino, Moscow region 143081 



Z. R. Rasulov
Clinical Hospital “Lapino” of the “Mother and Child” Group of companies
Russian Federation

111 1st Uspenskoe Shosse, Lapino, Moscow region 143081 



R. A. Rasulov
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

8 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991 



M. A. Shpunarskaya
Smolensk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

28 Krupskoy St., Smolensk 214019 



References

1. European Society of Coloproctology collaborating group. The relationship between method of anastomosis and anastomotic failure after right hemicolectomy and ileo-caecal resection: an international snapshot audit. Colorectal Dis 2017. DOI: 10.1111/codi.13646

2. Samia H., Lawrence J., Nobel T. et al. Extraction site location and incisional hernias after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: should we be avoiding the midline? Am J Surg 2013;205(3):264–7; discussion 268. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.006

3. Ricci C., Casadei R., Alagna V. et al. A critical and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2017;402(3):417–27. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-016-1509-x

4. Parisi A., Scrucca L., Desiderio J. et al. Robotic right hemicolectomy: analysis of 108 consecutive procedures and multidimensional assessment of the learning curve. Surg Oncol 2017;26(1):28–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2016.12.005

5. Stein S.A., Bergamaschi R. Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 2013;17 Suppl 1:S35–9. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0937-z

6. Skinner D., Wehrle C.J., Van Fossen K. Anatomy, abdomen and pelvis: inferior mesenteric artery. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2023.

7. Tajima Y., Ishida H., Ohsawa T. et al. Three-dimensional vascular anatomy relevant to oncologic resection of right colon cancer. Int Surg 2011;96(4):300–4. DOI: 10.9738/cc20.1

8. Van der Pas M.H., Haglind E., Cuesta M.A. et al.; Colorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR III): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(3):210–8. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0

9. Ribeiro U. Jr, Tayar D.O., Ribeiro R.A. et al. Laparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery: economic and clinical outcomes in the Brazilian healthcare. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99(42):e22718. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022718

10. Casciola L., Ceccarelli G., Di Zitti L. et al. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. Technical aspects and personal experience. Minerva Chir 2003;58(4):621–7.

11. Chernikovskiy I.L., Mel’nikov P.V., Savanovich N.V. et al. Intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a review of evidence and a single-center experience. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova = Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2019;(8):2065–9. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia201908265

12. Widmar M., Aggarwal P., Keskin M. et al. Intracorporeal anastomoses in minimally invasive right colectomies are associated with fewer incisional hernias and shorter length of stay. Dis Colon Rectum 2020;63(5):685–92.

13. Tarta C., Bishawi M., Bergamaschi R. Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis: a review. Tech Coloproctol 2013;17(5):479–85. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-013-0998-7

14. Milone M., Elmore U., Allaix M.E. et al. Fashioning enterotomy closure after totally laparoscopic ileocolic anastomosis for right colon cancer: a multicenter experience. Surg Endosc 2020;34(2):557–63. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06796-w

15. Nordholm-Carstensen A., Schnack Rasmussen M., Krarup P.M. Increased leak rates following stapled versus handsewn ileocolic anastomosis in patients with right-sided colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 2019;62(5):542–8. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001289

16. Cirocchi R., Trastulli S., Farinella E. et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy – systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Oncol 2013;22(1):1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2012.09.002

17. Dohrn N., Yikilmaz H., Laursen M. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in robotic right colectomy: a multicenter, triple-blind, randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2022;276(5):e294–301. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005254

18. Gómez Ruiz M., Espin-Basany E., Spinelli A.; MIRCAST study group. Early outcomes from the Minimally Invasive Right Colectomy Anastomosis study (MIRCAST). Br J Surg 2023;110(9):1153–1160. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad077. Erratum in: Br J Surg 2023;110(12):1906. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad306

19. Cleary R.K., Silviera M., Reidy T.J. et al. Intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis for robotic-assisted and laparoscopic right colectomy: short-term outcomes of a multi-center prospectivetrial. Surg Endosc 2022;36(6):4349–58. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08780-9

20. Romanova E.M., Sushkov O.I., Surovegin E.S. et al. Intracorporeal ileotransverse anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy. Results of randomized clinical trial. Koloproktologia = Russian Journal of Coloproctology 2024;23(2):76–84. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33878/2073-7556-2024-23-2-76-84

21. Zhang T., Sun Y., Mao W. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right hemicolectomy: upgrading the level of evidence. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023;38(1):147. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04445-2

22. Symeonidis D., Karakantas K.S., Kissa L. et al. Isoperistaltic vs antiperistaltic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy: a comprehensive review. World J Clin Cases 2023;11(8):1694–701. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i8.1694

23. Matsuda A., Miyashita M., Matsumoto S. et al. Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic stapled side-to-side anastomosis for colon cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res 2015;196(1):107–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.02.059

24. Ibáñez N., Abrisqueta J., Luján J. et al. Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Surg Endosc 2019;33(9):2850–7. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6580-7

25. Zhang M., Lu Z., Hu X. et al. Comparison of the short-term outcomes between intracorporeal isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic totally stapled side-to-side anastomosis for right colectomy: a retrospective study on 214 consecutive patients. Surg Open Sci 2022;9:7–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.03.006


Review

For citations:


Rasulov A.O., Madyarov J.M., Kulikov A.E., Rasulov Z.R., Rasulov R.A., Shpunarskaya M.A. Clinical example of intracorporeal antiperistaltic ileotransverse anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. MD-Onco. 2025;5(1):16-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2782-3202-2025-5-1-16-24

Views: 219


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-3202 (Print)
ISSN 2782-6171 (Online)