Preview

MD-Onco

Advanced search

Results of venous resections and reconstructions in retroperitoneal tumors

https://doi.org/10.17650/2782-3202-2024-4-2-37-45

Abstract

Background. Retroperitoneal tumors are rare, heterogeneous malignant neoplasms. Due to the low sensitivity of tumor to chemoradiation, surgical resection is the only curative treatment method for retroperitoneal sarcomas. Performance of radical surgery improves the outcome for these patients. There are little data about the results of the treatment of the patients who underwent en bloc resection of the retroperitoneal tumors combined with the resection of large vessel.

Aim. To analyze surgical and oncological outcomes of treatment retroperitoneal neoplasms with vascular involvement. 

Materials and methods. From 2019 to 2022, 27 patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas underwent surgical treatment with the resection of large vessels during the period.

Results. The average diameter of the tumors was 17 (11–39) cm. The most common histological type was moderately differentiated liposarcoma (33.4 %), followed by pleomorphic liposarcoma (22.2 %), highly differentiated (18.5 %), undifferentiated sarcoma (18.5 %), leiomyosarcoma (7.4 %). Resection of the suprarenal segment of the inferior vena cava (IVC) with prosthetics was performed in 4 cases, resection of the renal segment with renal vein reimplantation – in 1 case, resection of the infrarenal segment of the IVC with prosthetics – in 8 cases. A synthetic prosthesis was used as a conduit in all cases. Tangential resection of the suprarenal IVC portion was performed in 1 patient, infrarenal portion – in 5 patients. A resection of the infrarenal IVC portion was performed without reconstruction in 1 case. Resection of the iliac vein was required in 6 patients; in one case the resection of the arterial iliac segment and prosthetics was added. Complete resection (R0–R1) was achieved in 85.2 % of the cases. The incidence of postoperative complications went as far as 25.9 % with no postoperative mortality. Despite ongoing anticoagulant therapy, the frequency of thrombosis in venous reconstruction zone in the early postoperative period (1 month) was 7.4 %. The median relapse-free survival was 16 months, and the median of overall survival was not achieved.

Conclusion. Combined operations with the excision of retroperitoneal malignancies and angioplasty have explicitly acceptable level of postoperative complications and mortality. Eradication of retroperitoneal tumor with large vessels invasion allows to enlarge the life expectancy of patients often considered to be inoperable.

 

About the Authors

O. V. Katelnitskaya
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Oksana V. Katelnitskaya 

63 14th Liniya St., Rostov-on-Don 344037



O. I. Kit
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

63 14th Liniya St., Rostov-on-Don 344037



T. V. Ausheva
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

63 14th Liniya St., Rostov-on-Don 344037



N. S. Saforyan
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

63 14th Liniya St., Rostov-on-Don 344037



References

1. Gladdy R.A., Gupta A., Catton C.N. Retroperitoneal sarcoma: fact, opinion, and controversy. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2016;25(4):697–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2016.05.003

2. Malinka T., Nebrig M., Klein F. et al. Analysis of outcomes and predictors of long-term survival following resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma. BMC Surg 2019;19(1):61. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-019-0521-9

3. Bertrand M.M., Carrère S., Delmond L. et al. Oncovascular compartmental resection for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma with vascular involvement. J Vasc Surg 2016;64(4):1033–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.006

4. Kuehnl A., Schmidt M., Hornung H.M. et al. Resection of malignant tumors invading the vena cava: perioperative complications and long-term follow-up. J Vasc Surg 2007;46(3):533–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.04.067

5. Ferraris M., Callegaro D., Barretta F. et al. Outcome of iliocaval resection and reconstruction for retroperitoneal sarcoma. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2019;7(4):547–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.10.023

6. Hicks C.W., Glebova N.O., Piazza K.M. Risk of venous thromboembolic events following inferior vena cava resection and reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 2016;63(4):1004–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.09.020

7. Blair A.B., Reames B.N., Singh J. et al. Resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma en-bloc with inferior vena cava: 20 year outcomes of a single institution. J Surg Oncol 2018;118(1):127–37. DOI: 10.1002/jso.25096

8. Fiore M., Colombo C., Locati P. et al. Surgical technique, morbidity, and outcome of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma involving inferior vena cava. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19(2):511–8. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1954-2

9. Quinones-Baldrich W., Alktaifi A., Eilber F., Eilber F. Inferior vena cava resection and reconstruction for retroperitoneal tumor excision. J Vasc Surg 2012;55(5):1386–93; discussion 1393. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.054

10. Keung E.Z., Hornick J.L., Bertagnolli M.M. et al. Predictors of outcomes in patients with primary retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma undergoing surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2014;218(2):206–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.10.009


Review

For citations:


Katelnitskaya O.V., Kit O.I., Ausheva T.V., Saforyan N.S. Results of venous resections and reconstructions in retroperitoneal tumors. MD-Onco. 2024;4(2):37-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2782-3202-2024-4-2-37-45

Views: 277


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-3202 (Print)
ISSN 2782-6171 (Online)